Final Poster

Project Update 8

I have continued to meet with Dr. Karr to discuss the four maps and to make them as easily comprehensible as possible. We decided to map the confirmed number of elevated BLL cases per 10,000 children, per 10,000 housing units and per 10,000 pre-1950 housing units. The last map shows the decrease in percentage per year from 2006 to 2009. The designated counties were labeled with their name and appropriate value. Extent windows, scale bars, and North arrows were added to each map to make each one look more professional when by itself. 

In addition to fixing up the maps, I put together my poster for Academic Celebration. This is only a rough draft that was critiqued in class. There are a lot of little things to fix that I will have to do before the end of the week. To name a few things that have to be changed, the text boxes should have a white background and should be made smaller. I can get rid of the results section and add figure captions explaining the maps instead to make more room for the maps. In addition, the maps should be enlarged, since they should be the main focus of the poster. 

Project Update 7

I met with Dr. Karr last Thursday and made some adjustments to map original three maps that I put together last week or so. I had also created another map displaying the change in percentage of the number of confirmed cases per estimated child population per year from 2006 to 2009. All of the counties decreased in percentage, which is a good thing, but some decreased more than others. I have to find out how to draw the line so that I can move the label out of the county to clean things up a bit. I also have to figure out why on some of the maps there is a category in the legend for one data point that did not show up when I was formatting the labels to try and get rid of that. Hopefully I will be meeting with Dr. Meierdiercks tomorrow to figure these things out. Other than that I changed colors of the counties in NY we did not consider and the other states and the label headings. I was wondering, if it would be better to not go with the percent for the first three maps I put together. I am just trying to think of the simplest way of how to display the data considering the decimals are extremely tiny, but wanted to see how Dr. Karr wanted me to go about things.

Project Update 6

After much hardship I can finally say that I have entered in all the data I need by hand. I have created maps of confirmed cases normalized by estimated child population, confirmed cases normalized by total number of households, and confirmed cases normalized by number of pre-1950s households. I will be meeting with Dr. Karr on Thursday to discuss the maps and to see if this is what he is looking for. In addition to these maps, I can create the same maps, but for the data from 2006 and 2008 to see if there are any differences between the years.

Project Update 5

I need to call someone back tomorrow to see if I can get more info, but other than that I had another meeting with Dr. Karr to discuss what to map with the data I have collected thus far.We decided to map the number of confirmed cases normalized by the estimated child population, total number of housing, and total housing pre-1950. All of the previously done maps only show the number of cases or percent of children tested. Hopefully, the maps I create will be able to display the data in a way that has not been thought about before. The data has been collected, but no one has put together maps to visually display the information. Unfortunately, arcGIS crashed while I was working on my maps and I lost everything and the excel sheets I have are not joining with the county shapefile from the ESRI Maps and Data DVD. This week I will be working trying to resolve this issue and recreate the maps, even if it means entering all of the data by hand.